Bacckground
Monitoring of any health programme is essential for its safe and
successful implementation. Monitoring can be defined as a process
of measuring, recording, collecting and analyzing data on actual
implementation of the programme and communicating it to programme
managers, so that any deviation from the planned operations may
be detected, the reasons identified, and suitable corrective actions
taken. The purpose of health programme monitoring is to indicate
to those concerned whether the operation and performance of programme
is "on course". If it indicates inadequate performance,
programme manager has to rectify the situation. Thus, monitoring
helps in setting norms and measuring level performance. As with
all health services, abortion services should be subject to qualitymonitoring
and evaluation. If baseline data on morbidity and mortality from
unsafe abortion are available and basic service statistics are ccurately
kept, programmes will be able to evaluate the extent to which full
access to legal services reduces maternal morbidity and mortality.
QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED
A. What are the types of monitoring?
B. What to monitor?
C. How should the record-keeping and reporting to authorities be
done?
D. Who will monitor and how often?
E. What should be the qualification of the provider and how accreditation
is to be done?
VIEWS OF THE GROUP
The group needed to decide on as to how to monitor the
medical abortion programme.
A. Types of Monitoring
The monitoring systems for MTP must be built on existing monitoring
systems and must be within the context of the RCH programme. The
service-providers should routinely report to the authorities. There
shouldbe periodic monitoring of infrastructure, services and their
quality. The issue of baseline assessment of service readiness and
needs before introduction of medical abortion in the country was
also debated but consensus was not reached. Monitoring should be
decentralized to the district level.
B. What to monitor?
At the healthcare facility level, processes and mechanisms for
monitoring services include case reviews, log book reviews, observation,
checklists, facility surveys and maternal morbidity and death audits,
all of which can be used to improve quality of care.
1. Routine monitoring should include :
Infrastructure : The monitoring of infrastructure
including the number and location of licensed and functional facilities.
Provider : The emphasis would need to shift
from monitoring of places to monitoring of providers and his or
her access to emergency care medical facilities.
Services : Services to be monitored include
reporting of cases, their segregation by methods and gestational
age. It is needed to decide on the time-point at which a medical
abortion is counted as a case i.e. when process starts or when abortion
is complete.
Adverse events : Including failure to follow-up,
need for surgical evacuation, serious side-effects, reporting and
monitoring of complications and may be even monitoring of media
reports.
Quality : Inclusion of non-numeric qualitative
assessments of quality i.e. counseling and choice Training : Monitoring
the quality and adequacy of training being provided.
Training : Monitoring the quality and adequacy
of training being provided.
Progress : Assessment of progress to remedy problems
identified in routine monitoring
2. Registration and Approval of Place
• Any level of health-care facility including primary health
centre, clinic or hospital based set-up may be recognised for medical
abortion, provided there is adequate arrangement for management
of complications and referral (see below).
• It is desirable to ensure that misoprostol is administered
at the clinic and patient remains under observation for 3-4 hours
thereafter.
• Inspection of the place -
a. The place approved should be inspected by the Chief Medical
Officer of the District, as often as may be necessary with a view
to verifying whether termination of pregnancies is being done therein
under safe and hygienic conditions.
b. If the Chief Medical Officer has reason to believe that there
has been death of, or injury to, a pregnant woman at the place,
or that termination of pregnancies is not being done at the place
under safe and hygienic conditions, he may call for any information
or may seize any article, medicine, ampoule, admission register
or other document, maintained, kept or found at the place.
c. The provision of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of
1974), relating to seizure shall [so far as may be] apply to seizures
made under sub-rule(2).
d. At initial prescription and counseling make available the information
about emergency access facilities and telephone numbers.
e. Back-up facility to be identified and linkages created and formalized
with addresses available for referral.
f. Identify emergency and round the clock public and private hospital
facilities with availability of blood transfusion for transfer of
complications.
C. Record-keeping
The entire process needs to be recorded i.e. medical abortion
number, date of registration, date of the first dose, the second
and the follow-up visit, name of patient and her husband/father/guardian,
age, religion, address, marital status, education, duration of pregnancy,
reason for termination, obstetric history, significant past medical/
surgical history, findings of general/systemic and pelvic examination
and relevant investigations done. Also, the side-effects and outcome
of medical abortion, numbers lost to follow-up and the numbers requiring
surgical evacuation should be
recorded.
All medical practitioners performing medical abortion should maintain
an admission register for recording particulars of the women who
receive medical abortion. The forms need to be made more gendersensitive.
An informed written consent of the woman is mandatory.
The admission register should be a secret document and the particulars
of the pregnant woman should not be disclosed to any person except
under authority (as defined by MTP Regulations, 1975 Section of
MTP Act 1971). The entries made in case sheet, OT register, follow-up
card or any other document or register should not disclose the identity
of the pregnant woman in any way.
A record of complications and serious side-effects pertaining,
especially, to heavy bleeding ,necessitating the use of intravenous
fluids, blood-transfusion or curettage, sepsis, incomplete abortion,
continuation of pregnancy, adverse drug reactions, etc, should also
be maintained. Monitoring and reporting of complications should
be done irrespective of where abortion was initiated.
Reporting to authorities
Every head of the hospital or practitioner must send a monthly
record of medical abortion to the Chief Medical Officer (CMO) of
the State in form II. The record should include the name and address
of the practitioner, the completed consent forms and adverse drug
reactions, if found. Morbidity and mortality should be informed
to the authorities immediately.
Confidentiality should be maintained. The CMO of the State should,
in turn, send a report to the MOHFW.
D. Who will monitor and how
often?
Monitoring should be decentralized to the district level. One
representative each from the districtmonitoring cell, FOGSI, private
sector, women’s representative of Panchayati Raj and social
scientist should be included in the monitoring team. Data analysis
should be done at the local level with review every 6 to12 months.
E. Qualification and Accreditation
of the provider
Accreditation should be at the district level and the accreditation
body should include a member of the professional body like FOGSI
and must also have the power of delicensing. Remedial measures need
to be clearly spelt out. One time accreditation is not adequate
and licence-renewal should be done every 3-5 years.
The qualification and registration of providershould be verified
by the Chief of the Centre that has been recognised for providing
abortion services and reported to CMO of the district. A registered
medical Practitioner (RMP) as prescribed by MTP Act, will only be
authorized to prescribe medical abortion according to Definition
2(d), Section 2 and MTP Rule 3.
A Registered Medical Practitioner shall have one or more of the
following experience or training in gynaecology and obstetrics :
a. Before commencement of the Act, experience in the practice of
Obstetrics and Gynaecology for not less than 3 years.
b. After the date of commencement:
i. 6 months of housemanship in Obstetrics and Gynaecology.
ii. Experience at any hospital of not less than one year in the
practice of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.
iii. If assisted, an RMP in the performance of 25 cases of MTP
in a hospital established or maintained, or a training institute
approved for the purpose by the Govt.
c. Post-graduate degree or diploma in Obstetrics and Gynaecology.
Prescription for medications should bear doctor’s qualification
and State Medical Council Registration Number. RMPs with MBBS should
include inscription ‘certified to perform MTPs’. In
order to expand access, MBBS, paramedics and those trained in ISMs
may also, in future, be accredited for provision of medical abortion
services.
Thus, ongoing comprehensive monitoring of legally-induced abortions
is essential to track changes in the patterns and practices of abortion
services that will result with the introduction of these new methods.
Recommendations |
1. The MTP monitoring systems
must be within the context of RCH programme.
2. The system of licensing the infrastructure and facilities
needs to be simplified.
3. The facility as well as abortion-delivery services need to
be monitored.
4. Medical practitioners should maintain an admission register
for recording the particulars of the women undergoing medical
abortion.
5. A record of side-effects, adverse events and serious adverse
events need to be maintained.
6. A monthly record of medical abortion should be submitted
to the CMO of the State.
7. At the district level, monitoring should be done every 6
to 12 months.
8. The State monitoring team should include a wider representation
of stakeholders.
9. The qualification and registration of the provider must meet
the requirements as per the Indian MTP Act, 1971.
10. Modifications are needed to shift the emphasis on provider,
access and functioning counseling, appropriateness of protocol,
etc) rather than the place. |
|