| Emergency
Contraception also called the Post-Coital or the Morning after
Contraception can in many cases help women faced with the prospect of unplanned
and unwanted pregnancy to avoid pregnancy. If a couple had sexual intercourse
without using any form of contraception, or if there is a problem with the contraceptive
method they are using, for example, a leak or burst condom, a woman can become
pregnant. The risk for this varies depending upon the time when intercourse took
place during the cycle. Many women do not know that contraception following intercourse
is feasible or readily available and wait in agony for the periods to come and,
if missed, resort to various methods to terminate pregnancy with their potential
hazards.
Different aspects of Emergency Contraception
are being considered in this Consortium and I am sure that it is going to set
a tone for consensus. The most important requirement of the ideal Emergency Contraceptive
is that it should be highly effective. Women who seek emergency contraception
definitely want to avoid pregnancy. If a method, such as the condom, has already
failed, there is no place for another failure. Methods of emergency contraception
have also to be as safe as other methods, even though they are used only occasionally.
Emergency Contraception is used after unprotected sex, but before pregnancy has
become established. As such, it is considered a back-up method for
occasional rather than regular use. We have
to consider the technical aspects of various methods. Emergency contraception
methods consist of different regimens of widely-available contraceptives and some
have been used for decades in some countries. The first method used was the high
dose estrogen introduced in 1960s. But the same has a number of side-effects.
In 70s a combination of estrogen and progestins was used by Mr. Yuzpe which
is commonly known as Yuzpe method. In this method, low doses of estrogen
and norgestrel pills are given in two divided doses. The treatment is initiated
within 72 hours of unprotected sex and the second dose is repeated 12 hours later.
The hormones used are the same as are used in oral contraceptive pill marketed
in the country. Recently, levonorgestrel alone has been shown to be equally effective
in multi-centric, multi-country trials at HRP, WHO. Copper IUD used as a method
of Emergency Contraception is highly effective method with failure rate of around
0.1%. This method has additional advantage as it can be inserted upto 5 days after
intercourse and provides additional contraceptive protection for a number of years.
RU 486 or Mifepristone has also been used for Emergency Contraception. Emergency
Contraception has not been formally included so far in the National Family Welfare
Programme. Though contraceptive pills are available for regular use, their use
as emergency contraceptive drugs has not been promoted. Moreover,
no emergency contraceptive drug is available as brand name in India.
The Department of Family Welfare has encouraged further research in the field
of Emergency Contraception and provided assistance to ICMR and NGOs in this respect.
It will be included as a back-up to regular contraception and, hopefully,
the incidence of abortions and unwanted pregnancies will come down. Promotion
of Emergency Contraception in India needs careful planning and creation of infrastructure
for its implementation. The role of government agencies, medical associations,
NGOs and womens organizations needs to be carefully considered. The National
Family Health Survey (1998-99) has very clearly shown that unmet need
of contraception in India is 27% and it is even much higher upto 35-40% in some
of the areas. This is despite the fact that women and couples who were interviewed
were illiterate, but they did not want to have another child. Particularly in
the context of a situation where women have no power, it becomes very difficult
for them to get a contraceptive method. Even when methods like oral pill or condom
are available, with the type of habitation, with one or two small rooms, it may
be difficult to store or use contraception.
There are mainly three main
hurdles in making Emergency Contraception available to all women who require it.
First, information regarding Eemergency Contraceptives should reach the users
and providers on an equal footing. Since, there is a time-frame within which women
must use EC, the user must have access and knowledge of the method in advance.
Thus, education of the providers and organizations that can educate women at large
are the important prerequisites. Easy availability of user kits of emergency contraceptives
poses the second challenge. Our pharmaceutical industry along with NGOs and government
organizations should jointly initiate action to produce and publicise complete
and accurate information regarding the choice and details of methods with indications
of use. Third and the most important is the providers attitude. In India
KAP studies with emergency contraceptives with respect to both providers and users
are limited. Providers should broadly identify women for whom Emergency Contraception
is appropriate.
There are issues like logistics, packaging, transportation
and storage that need to be considered. We have to think of 600,000 villages,
138,000 sub-centres and over 1 million habitations in these villages. Then we
have to think of urban slums for providing EC services. This is a time of concern
for an Emergency Situation with respect to reproductive health and
well-being of women and I will put this as a top priority, and then only comes
the population-stabilization. Before we reach a consensus, these logistic problems
and the issues of womens health and reproductive health, as well as any
thing we do for them, need due consideration.
Our couple protection
rate though has been going up and stands at 48% in 1998-99, 5-6% of it is explained
by natural family planning, 30-35% by terminal methods (of which 97-98% is female
sterilization) and rest a very small 2-3% each is accounted for by spacing methods
including condom, pill and CuT, and this is despite all efforts by family planning
units. Thus, one has to think of EC in this context. We should consider EC introduction
in a phased manner. May be initially with a proper supervision, we can introduce
EC in urban areas, both as a social marketing channel as well as provision with
regular family planning services. Then we can gradually spread to rural areas.
The
issue of providing Emergency Contraception without prescription also needs consideration.
In India, young girls, unmarried women and those with less access to family planning
methods would experience difficulty in getting a prescription in time. Some of
the countries which have introduced Emergency Contraception in the family planning
programme initially faced some difficulties in its implementation. In India, we
can learn from their experiences. The barriers to the introduction of Emergency
Contraception, such as lack of awareness among consumers and service providers,
logistics of distribution of drugs, methods and religious and cultural consideration,
need to be overcome. The concerns of womens organizations are also valid
and need to be addressed.
It is sometimes argued that promotion of Emergency
Contraception would encourage promiscuity. Promiscuity in sexual relations exists
all over the world. Many countries have given social sanction to adolescent sexuality.
Moreover, pregnancy may occur inspite of using a contraceptive method, and it
may not be realised till the next menstruation when it is already too late to
start Emergency Contraception. The Emergency Contraception method is of value
to those who are using condom, diaphragm or oral pills. Obviously, adolescents
and unmarried women who are not using any contraception are also exposed to pregnancy
as are the victims of rape. it should be appreciated that risk of pregnancy and
induced abortion is greater than the risk of using Emergency Contraception.
Finally,
it should be emphasised that Emergency Contraception is not as effective as regular
use of contraception. Moreover, undesirable effects are more common after Emergency
Contraception than during regular use. Therefore, Emergency Contraception should
be promoted as a back-up method when regular methods are not used,
used incorrectly or fail for other reasons.
The present seminar is an
effort to sensitise the providers, the adolescent groups, teachers, womens
advocacy groups and industry in the concept of Emergency Contraception; seek their
views and opinions; and identify relevant issues and prerequisites for introduction
of Emergency Contraception in India. Back
to Top
| | |